Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-09 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-05-09 House Journal Page 1497 HB 174 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 174 "An Act relating to the state centralized correspondence study program, to funding for educational programs that occur primarily outside school facilities, and to the duties of school boards of borough and city school districts and regional educational attendance areas; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page EDU RPT 3DNP 2NR 1AM 583 FN1: (EED) 583 FN2: (EED) 583 HES RPT 2DP 2DNP 2NR 666 FN1: (EED) 667 FN2: (EED) 667 STA RPT CS(STA) 2DP 4NR 1119 FN2: (EED) 1119 FN3: (EED) 1119 FIN RPT CS(FIN) 5DP 4NR 1450 FN2: (EED) 1451 FN3: (EED) 1451 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 174(FIN) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives McGuire and Rokeberg: 2003-05-09 House Journal Page 1498 Page 2, lines 16 - 23: Delete all material. Renumber remaining sections accordingly. Representative McGuire moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 174(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 35 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Dahlstrom, Foster, Gara, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Croft, Joule, Kapsner Absent: Fate, Harris And so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 174(FIN) am be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 174(FIN) am was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 174(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2003-05-09 House Journal Page 1499 CSHB 174(FIN) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 34 NAYS: 2 EXCUSED: 3 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kerttula, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Crawford, Gara Excused: Croft, Joule, Kapsner Absent: Harris And so, CSHB 174(FIN) am passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 174(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.